Fan-Sites.org Ad

Latest Images

• current projects
Magneto
Role: Mystique/Raven Darkholme
Status: In Talks
Release: Unknown
Info | Official | Pictures
Hatter
Role: Alice Allyson
Status: In Production
Release: 2009
Info | Official | Pictures
Ugly Betty
Role: Alexis Meade
Status:
Season One - Finish
Season Two - Airing
Release: 2006-2008
Info | Official | Pictures
Lake City
Role: Jennifer
Status: In Production/Awaiting Release
Release: 2007
Info | Official | Pictures

Link Us





Top Affiliates


Listed at
Celebrity-Exchange.com
Link-Lounge.com
Celebrity-Portal.com
Aceshowbiz.com
Fan-Sites.org
Vote for this Site!

Statistics
Owner: Damita aka Carmel
Since: August 16th 2006
Host: Fan-Sites.org
Hits: hits

Search for Rebecca
AMAZONALLPOSTERSEBAY

• Welcome
Welcome to Romijn-Online.net, an extensive fan site for the model-turned-actress,

Rebecca Romijn

Rebecca is known for her movie roles as Mystique in X-Men and her role in Femme Fatale (2002) plus from the hit TV series Ugly Betty.

Our goal is to become your number 1 source for anything and everything Rebecca.

Enjoy your stay!


Godsend (2004)

Godsend is a 2004 horror/drama movie, and is directed by Nick Hamm. The score is by Brian Tyler.

As a part of the movie's promotional campaign, Lions Gate Films set up a website for the fictional Godsend Institute in the movie, which claimed to be able to resurrect the dead. Lions Gate were forced to change the website informing people that is was only an advertisement, due to the large number of inquiries asking if they really could bring back dead family members.

The movie was poorly received by critics, and is noted for implausible plot devices.

» Plot - Spoiler warning: Plot and ending details follow

Thanks to wikipedia.org for the information

The film starts with the Duncans (Kinnear and Romijn), burying their 8-year old son Adam. They are then approached by Dr. Richard Wells (De Niro) at the funeral home, who claims he can clone their son and Jessie Duncan could then give birth to him again. They agree to it, but the procedure is illegal and they therefore have to move away in order to keep it a secret. The new Adam Duncan reaches his 8th birthday unaware of what had happened, but then starts having night-terrors which develop into visions. He becomes increasingly violent, and when a child drowns at Adam's school, Paul Duncan is prompted to investigate Dr. Wells. Eventually it transpires that when Wells cloned Adam Duncan, he inserted the DNA of his own dead son, Zachary Clark, into the process, causing Adam to eventually develop a split personality: Adam Duncan and Zachary Clark. Unfortunately for all involved, Zachary was a psychopath who murdered his mother, and under the influence of Zachary's memories, Adam attempts to do the same.

» DVD Information

Fan Review
After losing their son, Adam (Cameron Bright), to a freak accident, Paul (Greg Kinnear) and Jessie Duncan (Rebecca Romijn-Stamos), are approached by Dr. Richard Wells (Robert De Niro), with a risky and illegal idea--to try "replacing" Adam with a clone.

In my way of looking at ratings, 7s are Cs. They tend to do as many things wrong as right. Godsend has some admirable script characteristics, a good to great cast and some very good technical aspects. But it also has negative script characteristics and some questionable directing and editing.

Overall, I believe Godsend is worth watching, so let's look at the positive points first. It's rare that filmic science fiction--and this is just as much as science fiction film as a thriller or horror film--tries to tackle "hard science" as exposition and motivation. Although Godsend also mixes some strong fantasy elements into its "twist" and the consequences that lead to the film being a thriller/horror picture, the basic idea is one rooted in actual genetics. De Niro is given quite a few mouthfuls of science-oriented dialogue that are fairly sound, and for my money, he delivers them well.

I'm a big fan of De Niro's, so I tend to be gracious in my evaluation of his work. But I could see where some viewers less enamored with De Niro overall might find his performance here questionable. It's certainly a bit different than normal, being oddly restrained and almost emotionless for much of the film. For me, that approach fit the character, given his profession and eventual revelations about his personality. The other three principles--Kinnear, Romijn-Stamos and Bright--were good in my view, but again I can see where some viewers could interpret their performances negatively. To me, however, all of the obvious problems stem from direction and editing, not the actors' work.

The biggest problem seems to stem from director Nick Hamm's comments about the horror/thriller genre. He has stated, "what was interesting to me about Godsend was that the horror and the suspense had nothing to do with anything supernatural or spiritual". Hamm isn't a very big fan of the fantasy aspect of horror, which to me, translates into not being a very big horror fan. This led to trying to create a horror film where suspense arises out of realist drama and psychological situations. The realist drama in Godsend tends to be very slow and relatively uneventful--just as one might expect from someone not really wanting to make a horror film. Psychological horror is barely approached. There just isn't enough that happens. There are two potential villains, but neither does much. It would be very difficult to call either "evil".

Kinnear and Romijn-Stamos aren't given enough to work with. They don't have anything very meaty to react to. Hamm seems too afraid to leave realist drama territory, at least in terms of the overall plot/action. That makes some of their "horrified" reactions seem shallow or false. Worse, Hamm doesn't seem to know how to cut horror films very well. Scenes go on far longer than they should, and occasionally almost seem as if we're seeing a bit of the footage either before Hamm said "Action" or after he called "Cut". A prime example of this is the scene near the end when Romijn-Stamos is walking through woods toward a shed.

Godsend is also one of the few cases where copious DVD extras may have hurt the film more than helped. The DVD contains four alternate endings, averaging about 12 minutes long each. These occasionally deviate strongly from the theatrical ending, but none seem quite satisfying (all of the more nihilistic endings that Hamm described on his commentary but which apparently weren't shot would have done the trick for me; I also liked the filmed tag suggesting a sequel). They all tend to drag on, an impression that isn't helped by the lack of a score and a sound effects soundtrack.

Also curious, given Hamm's dislike of the fantasy aspects of genre films, is the fact that the crux of the "twist" in Godsend is extremely loopy. What's happening with Adam makes little sense from a realistic/scientific standpoint, and how it happened just isn't possible. Of course, I'm not averse to fantasy, and I don't subtract points for elements in film that are wildly divergent from our beliefs and understanding of the actual world. But if Hamm is going to abandon realism when it comes to important plot points, why not abandon it wholesale, so that we can maybe see a film that deserves an A instead?

DVD Description
Following the death of their eight-year-old son Adam, devastated parents Jessie (Rebecca Romijn-Stamos) and Paul (Greg Kinnear) are desperate to do anything to resurrect their beloved child. Befriended by a doctor at the forefront of genetic research (Robert De Niro), they are offered a chance to reverse the rules of nature and clone their son. The experiment appears successful under the doctor's watchful eye and Adam grows into a healthy, happy, young boy. Until his eighth birthday. Reaching the age at which the original Adam died, the new Adam begins to change and a new sinister personality emerges...

» Critics Reviews

Thanks to critics for the information

(opens in a new window)



[ Back ]